Mary E. EVANS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley E. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the ALJ's hypothetical questions “must include all (and only) those impairments borne out by the evidentiary record”
• restating “the established rule that such inquiries must include all (and only) those impairments borne out by the evidentiary record”
• noting “the established rule” that hypothetical questions “must include all (and only) those impairments borne out by the evidentiary record”
• reversing denial of benefits where impairment had both exertional and nonexertional consequences and ALJ focused on only one
• reversing final decision where claimant suffered from bilateral carpal tunnel and the ALJ’s hypothetical failed to include limitations on claimant’s ability to perform repetitive movements and/or work requiring strength or dexterity that would place stress on her wrists
• ALJ’s hypothetical questions to vocational expert “must include all (and only) those impairments borne out by the evidentiary record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).