Skip to main content
· 8/15/2014

Mary Doucette v. Morrison County, Minnesota

Citations

  • 763 F.3d 978
  • 2014 WL 3973082
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15693
  • 98 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,134
  • 124 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A legitimate reason for discharge may include the plaintiffs lack of improvement in the specific areas in which she was counseled.”
  • “A legitimate reason for discharge may include the plaintiffs lack of improvement in the specific areas in which she was counseled.”
  • “A legitimate reason for discharge may include the plaintiff’s lack of improvement ‘in the specific areas in which she was counseled.’” (citation omitted)
  • “[The plaintiff] has not provided enough information regarding-her two male co-workers that, if true, would give rise to a génuine issue of material fact.”
  • “It is not our role to question that [the employee’s] errors were a problem for her employer.”
  • “‘Sex-plus’ discrimination occurs when employees are classified on the basis of sex plus one other seemingly neutral characteristic.” (quoting Knott v. Mo. Pac. R. Co., 527 F.2d 1249, 1251 (8th Cir. 1975))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colloton, Shepherd, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.