Mary Dilda v. Arthur Quern, Director, Illinois Department of Public Aid

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a notice of adverse action is constitutionally inadequate if it lacks the individualized calculations underlying the benefit award
• holding a due process violation for lack of notice of the possible decrease in a food stamp allotment because notice did not meaningfully inform persons so they could protect their interest
• holding a due process violation for lack of notice of the possible decrease in a food stamp allotment because notice did not meaningfully inform persons so they could protect their interest
• \[T]he risk of erroneous calculations by the Department far outweighs the increased burden on the administration.... Due Process can be satisfied by simply photocopying the work papers and enclosing them with the notice....\
• \[The risk of erroneous calculations by the Department far outweighs the increased burden on the administration.... Due Process can be satisfied by simply photocopying the work papers and enclosing them with the notice. ...\
• requiring an identical remedy in a similar situation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).