Skip to main content
· 5/17/1989

Mary D. Tipton v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce

Citations

  • 872 F.2d 1491
  • 4 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 721
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6631
  • 50 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 39,028
  • 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1490
  • 1989 WL 42393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the district court’s finding that the employee’s “discharge was the direct result of her abusive and disrespectful conduct toward her superior,” not because of discrimination
  • “The employee need not prove the underlying claim of discrimination which led to her [complaint]”
  • disqualification not warranted where law firm representing defendant in one action and representing plaintiff in unrelated property matter withdrew from latter action and where no indication that confidential information had been obtained

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Hatchett, Fitzpatrick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.