Mary D. Pollard v. High's of Baltimore, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that nine-month period of recovery from surgery was insufficient to constitute a permanent or long-term impairment under the ADA
• concluding that restrictions that plaintiff not lift more than twenty-five pounds or bend repetitively were “not significantly restricting”
• holding that plaintiffs ability to work for a different employer reinforced that she was not substantially limited in her ability to work
• holding that nine-month period of recovery from surgery was insufficient to constitute a permanent or long-term impairment under the ADA
• concluding that a plaintiff with restrictions that she not lift more than twenty-five pounds or bend repetitively did not suffer from a permanent impairment that substantially limited her in any major life activity
• finding that an injury which led to a nine-month absence from work was insufficient to demonstrate that [the plaintiff] had a disability under the ADA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).