Mary Chambers v. DC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that once police lawfully secured consent to search, any delay occasioned by the search did not constitute an unlawful extension of the seizure
• recognizing that “officers may complete ‘routine tasks,’ such as ‘computerized checks of . . . the driver’s license and criminal history’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).