Mary Carroll v. Merrill Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[N]othing requires the district court to disbelieve defendants’ proffered evidence simply because Ms. Carroll—without proof—asserts it is false.”
• “neither a desire to cross- examine an affiant nor an unspecified hope of undermining his or her credibility suffices to avert summary judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).