Skip to main content
· 1/26/1999

Mary C. Quaratino v. Tiffany & Co., Michael Eiring and David Wright

Citations

  • 166 F.3d 422
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 943
  • 78 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1849
  • 1999 WL 27058

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that unsuccessful claims may be awarded fees, but only if \inextricably intertwined\ with successful work (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • discussing the twelve factors that a court should consider in assessing the reasonableness of attorney’s fees
  • finding district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that “fees should not be awarded for time spent on [plaintinff’s] unsuccessful motion for a new trial”
  • finding district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that “fees should not be awarded for time spent on [plaintinff’s] unsuccessful motion for a new trial”
  • “Congress enacted fee-shifting in civil rights litigation precisely because the expected monetary recovery in many cases was too small to attract 19 effective legal representation.”
  • “Congress enacted fee-shifting in civil rights litigation precisely because the expected monetary recovery in many cases was too small to attract effective legal representation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Miner, Cabranes, Winter, Walker, Jacobs, Leval, Calabresi, Parker, Pooler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.