· 1/26/1999
Mary C. Quaratino v. Tiffany & Co., Michael Eiring and David Wright
Citations
- 166 F.3d 422
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 943
- 78 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1849
- 1999 WL 27058
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that unsuccessful claims may be awarded fees, but only if \inextricably intertwined\ with successful work (internal quotation marks omitted)
- discussing the twelve factors that a court should consider in assessing the reasonableness of attorney’s fees
- finding district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that “fees should not be awarded for time spent on [plaintinff’s] unsuccessful motion for a new trial”
- finding district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that “fees should not be awarded for time spent on [plaintinff’s] unsuccessful motion for a new trial”
- “Congress enacted fee-shifting in civil rights litigation precisely because the expected monetary recovery in many cases was too small to attract 19 effective legal representation.”
- “Congress enacted fee-shifting in civil rights litigation precisely because the expected monetary recovery in many cases was too small to attract effective legal representation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kearse, Miner, Cabranes, Winter, Walker, Jacobs, Leval, Calabresi, Parker, Pooler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.