· 2/13/2004
Mary Arrow v. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Citations
- 358 F.3d 392
- 15 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 511
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 2407
- 1 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) 11
- 2004 WL 256983
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- emphasizing that farmer did not “delegate statutory contracting activities”
- applying Leon and holding that a state anti-discrimination claim was preempted
- applying Leon and holding that a state anti-discrimination claim was preempted
- in considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kennedy, Martin, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.