Mary Anne Hedrich v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no reasonable fact- finder could conclude that it was “virtually impossible” for plaintiff to find work within her occupation where she had applied to just seven jobs
• observing that “to make a claim for equitable estoppel, the plaintiff must present evidence that the defendant [took] active steps to prevent the plaintiff from suing in time”
• the court considers only evidence set forth in a proposed finding of fact with proper citation
• courts are to consider only evidence set forth in proposed finding of fact with proper citation
• courts are to consider only evidence set forth in proposed finding of fact with proper citation
• courts are to consider only evidence set forth in proposed finding of fact with proper citation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).