Skip to main content
· 12/3/1985

Mary Ann Keeffe v. Library of Congress

Citations

  • 777 F.2d 1573
  • 250 U.S. App. D.C. 117
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 24652

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “whether self-initiated or initiated by others, this review procedure enables the employee to resolve any ambiguity about the reach of the regulation and to decide whether it will be applied to her proposed conduct”
  • leaving “the Library free to adopt those interpretations that permit and even encourage the widest possible participation of its employees in public life”
  • leaving \the Library free to adopt those interpretations that permit and even encourage the widest possible participation of its employees in public life\
  • affirming district court’s equitable order directing the Library to expunge from its personnel records all references to unwarranted adverse action against an employee
  • inquiring “whether Keeffe had fair notice, at the time she left for the Democratic Convention in New York, that her service as a delegate was legitimately proscribed because it conflicted with her professional duty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikva, Ginsburg, Markey, Federal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.