Mary Ann Crawford v. Medina General Hospital, Darla Kermendy, Kenneth Milligan, and Rex Slee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a hostile- environment claim is actionable under the ADEA as under Title VII because the statutes share similar language
• holding that the employer’s statements that “old people should be seen and not heard” and “I don’t think women over 55 should be working” were not particularly severe or degrading
• noting that “[t]he elements and burden of proof are the same, regardless of the discrimination context in which the claim arises.”
• holding two remarks about “women over 55 working” and “old people” by supervisor were offensive utterances insufficient to constitute a pervasive environment based on age as opposed to “a simple clash of personalities”
• acknowledging that “courts routinely employ Title VII and ADEA case law interchangeably”
• acknowledging that “courts routinely employ Title VII and ADEA case law interchangeably”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).