Marvina Wilbert v. James Sewell (Appeal from Madison Circuit Court: CV-22-900728).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “reasonableness can only constitute a question of law suitable for summary judgment when the facts are undisputed and not fairly susceptible of divergent inferences….”
• “While courts say they are looking for the intention of the parties, in reality they are making a judgment about the scope of coverage based on the text of the policy, the circumstances, and public policy.” (emphasis omitted
• “While courts say they are looking for the intention of the parties, in reality they are making a judgment about the scope of coverage based on the text of the policy, the circumstances, and public policy.” (emphasis omitted) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).