Skip to main content
· 12/20/1971

Marvin Phillips v. Peter J. Pitchess, Sheriff

Citations

  • 451 F.2d 913

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Petitioner, in his traverse, has not disputed the contention [at issue], and thus 7 this Court may accept the fact that he has not exhausted his remedies with respect to this issue.” 8 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 2248)
  • “Petitioner, 14 in his traverse, has not disputed the contention [at issue], and thus this Court may accept the fact 15 that he has not exhausted his remedies with respect to this issue.” (citing 28 U.S.C. § 2248)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Browning, Trask

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.