Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. Sapa Extrusions, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Counsel or litigants cannot use the work product doctrine to hide facts underlying the litigation from discovery.”
• requiring government to provide facts in an interrogatory response
• shielding media and advertising schedules from public disclosure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).