Marvin L. Miller v. City of LaFollette

Syllabus

The genesis of this case lies in the investigation into a city's police department and subsequent termination of the appellant, a former police department employee. After the appellant was terminated, his counsel sent a public records request to the city, one of the appellees herein, pursuant to the Tennessee Public Records Act. Through this public records request, the city was asked for copies of, among other things, \investigative material\ related to the appellant. Although some records were initially produced in response to the public records request, other records were not provided until after litigation was initiated by the appellant in chancery court. Certain \investigatory\ records that had formerly been in the possession of an attorney hired by the city to investigate the police department were not ever produced. Although the parties dispute whether such \investigatory\ records would be subject to disclosure under the Tennessee Public Records Act, such records had, according to the findings of the chancery court, been destroyed by the time the city received the public records request at issue herein. Upon the conclusion of the trial litigation, the chancery court also found that \all requested documents that exist had been provided\ and determined that the city \did not willfully refuse to disclose documents and records.\ In light of its determination that the city did not act willfully, the chancery court held that attorney's fees would not be awarded in this case. For the reasons stated herein, the chancery court's judgment is affirmed in part and vacated in part, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion.