Marven Lemock v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “title to the patents, the responsibility to pay maintenance fees on the patents, and a right to notice of litigation and licensing activities are not substantial rights”
• noting that we have found disavowal or disclaimer based on statements such as “the present invention includes” or “the present in- vention is”
• noting we have found disavowal or disclaimer based on statements such as \the present invention includes\ or \the present invention is\
• noting we have found disavowal or disclaimer based on statements such as “the present invention includes” or “the present invention is”
• finding no substantial rights were retained where the licensor retained “the title to the patents, the responsibility to pay maintenance fees on the patents, and a right to notice of litigation”
• “Under our precedent, only parties with exclusionary rights to a patent may bring suit for patent infringement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).