Marvelli v. Alston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining whether the wrongful act “was ‘a’ proximate cause, not ‘the’ proximate cause” of decedent’s death
• determining whether the wrongful act “was ‘a’ proximate cause, not ‘the’ proximate cause” of decedent’s death
• expert’s testimony that plaintiffs vision would have “in reasonable medical probability” been saved held legally sufficient to establish cause-in-fact
• expert’s testimony that plaintiff’s vision would have “in reasonable medical probability” been saved held legally sufficient to establish cause-in-fact
• expert’s testimony that plaintiff’s vision would have “in reasonable medical probability” been saved held legally sufficient to establish cause-in-fact
• “the expert must explain the basis of his statement to link his conclusions to the facts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).