Marvel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the Superior Court’s denial of Marvel’s motion for correction of illegal sentence
• affirming the Superior Court’s denial of Marvel’s motion for correction of illegal sentence
• affirming denial of motion for correction of illegal sentence and stating that “the State provided sufficient support for Marvel’s status as a habitual offender and therefore his sentence is not illegal under Rule 35(a)”
• whether “erroneous or not,” a term in a sentence that has no “significant current impact” on a Rule 35(a) movant doesn’t “present[] any ‘actual controversy’ ripe for consideration by this Court.”
• whether “erroneous or not,” a term in a sentence that has no “significant current impact” on a Rule 35(a) movant doesn’t “present[] any ‘actual controversy’ ripe for consideration by this Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marvel v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2018-05-30
• Marvel v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2023-03-03
• State v. Johnson
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2025-05-19
• State v. Kellam
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2026-03-31