Skip to main content

Marvel v. State

Citations

  • 977 A.2d 899
  • 2009 WL 2158107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming denial of motion for correction of illegal sentence and stating that Marvel’s claim that “the State’s motion to declare him a habitual offender was insufficient . . . to identify the predicate felonies” did not entitle him to relief under Rule 35(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holland, Jacobs and Ridgely, Justices

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.