Supreme Court of Delaware· 7/21/2009
Marvel v. State
Citations
- 977 A.2d 899
- 2009 WL 2158107
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming denial of motion for correction of illegal sentence and stating that Marvel’s claim that “the State’s motion to declare him a habitual offender was insufficient . . . to identify the predicate felonies” did not entitle him to relief under Rule 35(a
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holland, Jacobs and Ridgely, Justices
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.