Marvel Engineering Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting \ 'the notion that the policies against multiplicity of litigation and against piecemeal appeals may be avoided at the whim of a plaintiff.' \
• involving a conditional dismissal of claims via a stipulation between the parties that “[t]he district court approved”
• requiring overtime be 17 paid to officers who worked in field and often at night with 18 infrequent contact with supervisors
• rejecting “ ‘the notion that the policies against multiplicity of litigation and against piecemeal appeals may be avoided at the whim of a plaintiff.’”
• \litigants should not be able to avoid the final judgment rule without fully relinquishing the ability to further litigate unresolved claims\
• “An order must conclusively terminate the litigation in order to be considered final; an order that may terminate the proceeding is insufficient.” (emphasis in original) (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).