Marty Holland v. State of Tennessee

Syllabus

The Petitioner, Marty Holland, appeals from the Hardeman County Circuit Court's denial of post-conviction relief. On appeal, the Petitioner argues generally that \the postconviction court erred in finding [the Petitioner] received effective assistance of counsel.\ Based on the issues developed at the post-conviction hearing and the order of the post-conviction court, the issue presented is whether the Petitioner's guilty pleas are constitutionally infirm due to trial counsel's failure to investigate (1) a coerced confession (2) the validity of a bench warrant concerning an unrelated offense and (3) a search warrant executed at the Petitioner's home concerning an unrelated case. Following our review, we deem it necessary to remand this matter to the post-conviction court for a hearing to determine whether the Petitioner was advised of the circumstances attendant to entering a guilty plea based upon an agreement that his state sentence would be served concurrently to a previously imposed federal sentence. In all other respects, the judgment of the post-conviction court it affirmed.