Supreme Court of Connecticut· 5/3/1988
Martone v. Lensink
Citations
- 207 Conn. 296
- 541 A.2d 488
- 1988 Conn. LEXIS 111
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the purpose of the ex parte provision in the Connecticut APA is “to preclude litigious facts reaching the deciding minds without getting into the record.”
- words of a statute “are to be given their commonly approved meaning, unless a contrary intent is clearly expressed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-05-23· cited 149×
- New England Rehabilitation Hospital of Hartford, Inc. v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-06-22· cited 132×
- Blaker v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-08-08· cited 108×
- Iovieno v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-26· cited 71×
- Superintendent of Police v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-30· cited 70×
- City of West Haven v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-02-11· cited 59×
- Arnold v. LebelSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2007-12-24· cited 44×
- Smith v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-05-18· cited 42×
- Marshall v. DelPonteConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-04-14· cited 42×
- Iovieno v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-02· cited 31×
- Martone v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-05-15· cited 7×
- Menillo v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-12-23· cited 6×
- Perun v. City of DanburyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-06-11· cited 6×
- LaPia v. Town of StratfordConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-12-30· cited 4×
- Fenton v. United Technologies Corp.D. Connecticut· 2002-05-31
- Champlin's Realty Associates v. TikoianSuperior Court of Rhode Island· 2009-02-24
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 804×
- United States Lines, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America, Hapag-Lloyd A. G., IntervenorsD.C. Circuit· 1978-08-25· cited 155×
- Persico v. MaherSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-09-13· cited 102×
- State v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-05-20· cited 87×
- Leib v. Board of Examiners for NursingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-03-20· cited 83×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-08-07· cited 79×
- Henderson v. Department of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-03-10· cited 68×
- Connecticut Natural Gas Corp. v. Public Utilities Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-02-13· cited 65×
- Harlow v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-08-07· cited 44×
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-02-23· cited 32×
- Seebach v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1980-05-23· cited 19×
- Grodis v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-05-03· cited 13×
- Henderson v. Department of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court· 1985-05-28· cited 6×
Other cases named Martone v. Lensink
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.