New York Court of Appeals· 12/10/1969
Martirano v. Frost
Citations
- 25 N.Y.2d 505
- 255 N.E.2d 693
- 307 N.Y.S.2d 425
- 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 924
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] statement, made in open court in the course of a judicial proceeding, is absolutely privileged if, by any view or under any circumstances, it may be considered pertinent to the litigation.”
- “[A] statement, made in open court in the course of a judicial proceeding, is absolutely privileged if, by any view or under any circumstances, it may be considered pertinent to the litigation.”
- “a statement made . . . in the course of a judicial proceeding is absolutely privileged if, by any view or under any circumstances, it may be considered pertinent to the litigation.”
- a courtroom statement is absolutely privileged unless it is “so outrageously out of context as to permit one to conclude, from the mere fact that the statement was uttered, that it was motivated by no other desire than to defame”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burke, Fuld
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Park Knoll Associates v. SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals· 1983-06-09· cited 141×
- McGranahan v. DaharSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1979-10-24· cited 85×
- Grasso v. MathewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-01-03· cited 46×
- Butler v. RatnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-12-08· cited 42×
- Garson v. HendlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1988-09-26· cited 40×
- Katz v. MorgenthauS.D. New York· 1989-03-17· cited 39×
- Sexter & Warmflash, P.C. v. MargrabeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-01-04· cited 38×
- Aguirre v. Best Care Agency, Inc.E.D. New York· 2013-08-16· cited 35×
- Conte v. Newsday, Inc.E.D. New York· 2010-03-25· cited 29×
- Mosesson v. Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law FirmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-01-07· cited 27×
- Cavallaro v. PozziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-04-28· cited 26×
- Danahy v. MeeseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1981-10-30· cited 26×
- Flomenhaft v. FinkelsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2015-04-28· cited 22×
- Carroll v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1982-05-11· cited 16×
- Panzella v. BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-01-28· cited 16×
- El Jamal v. WeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2014-04-09· cited 15×
- Dachowitz v. KranisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1978-02-06· cited 13×
- Abelow v. GrossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1982-12-16· cited 13×
- Rabiea v. SteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-01-12· cited 12×
- Weinstock v. SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2016-11-23· cited 11×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Martirano v. Frost
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.