Skip to main content
· 12/6/1996

Martinson v. Massachusetts Bay Insurance

Citations

  • 947 F. Supp. 124
  • 44 ERC (BNA) 1110
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18380
  • 1996 WL 711504

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • entering summary judgment in favor of the non-moving defendant and against the plaintiffs, who had moved for summary judgment
  • even though lawsuit did not mention years for which damages were sought, insured's knowledge of its dumping practices made it unreasonable for insured to conclude that only current carrier needed notification
  • “Although a principal is generally bound by notice given to his agent, this is not true when the person giving notice had no expectation that it would be transmitted to the principal …”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.