Martinovic v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that in order to suspend a licensee's operating privilege under Section 1547(b)(1
• noting that while the [I]implied [C]onsent [L]aw imposes a duty on the police officer to apprise a motorist of the consequences of chemical test refusal, the officer has no duty to make certain that the motorist understands said consequences
• noting that in order for DOT to meet its prima facie burden establishing its entitlement to suspend a licensee’s operating privilege, DOT must show, inter alia, that the licensee was “specifically warned” about the consequences of refusing a chemical test
• noting that in order for DOT to meet its prima facie burden establishing its entitlement to suspend a licensee's operating privilege, DOT must show, inter alia, that the licensee was \specifically warned\ about the consequences of refusing a chemical test
• noting that in order for DOT to meet its prima facie burden establishing its entitlement to suspend a licensee’s operating privilege, DOT must show, inter alia, that the licensee was “specifically warned” about the consequences of refusing a chemical test
• noting that in order for DOT to meet its prima facie burden establishing its entitlement to suspend a licensee’s operating privilege, DOT must show, inter alia, that the licensee was “specifically warned” about the consequences of refusing a chemical test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).