Martino v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing a conflict over whether an independent cause of action should exist for first-party spoliation of evidence and approving the Fourth District’s dismissal of the cause of action for spoliation in Martino
• disapproving Bondu v. Gurvich, 473 So.2d 1307 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
• section 57.105 provides that “the court shall award a reasonable attorney’s fee to be paid to the prevailing party,” but makes no mention of costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).