Skip to main content
· 5/3/1995

Martino v. Metropolitan Dade County

Citations

  • 655 So. 2d 151
  • 1995 WL 253948

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • even in absence of contemporaneous objections to improper remarks in closing argument, cumulative effect of improper and prejudicial comments rises to level of fundamental error
  • counsel suggesting adverse effect on future case if jury returned a verdict for plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baskin, Levy and Goderich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.