California Court of Appeal· 6/18/1986
Martino v. Denevi
Citations
- 182 Cal. App. 3d 553
- 227 Cal. Rptr. 354
- 1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 1727
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that “an attorney’s failure to keep books of account and other records has been found to be a basis for disciplinary action,” but not sufficient 28 to justify reducing attorneys’ fees
- finding testimony of attorney as to total hours work sufficient without time records
- “Testimony of an attorney as to the number of hours 8 worked on a particular case is sufficient evidence to support an aware of attorney fees, even in the 9 absence of detailed records.”
- rejecting federal precedent requiring submission of detailed, contemporaneous time records
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Low
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Winterrowd v. American General Annuity InsuranceNinth Circuit· 2009-02-17· cited 110×
- Ajaxo Inc. v. E Trade Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2005-12-21· cited 102×
- Mardirossian & Associates, Inc. v. ErsoffCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-06-18· cited 76×
- Donahue v. DonahueCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-02-24· cited 60×
- Rancho Mirage Country Club Homeowners Ass'n v. HazelbakerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-08-09· cited 54×
- Stephens v. Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1988-04-01· cited 50×
- Asbestos Claims Facility v. Berry & BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-03-26· cited 43×
- Steiny & Co. v. California Electric Supply Co.California Court of Appeal· 2000-03-23· cited 39×
- In re Taco Bell Wage & Hour ActionsE.D. California· 2016-07-15· cited 32×
- Ackerman v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.N.D. California· 1986-09-02· cited 31×
- Adam v. DeCharonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-01-18· cited 21×
- Hartless v. Clorox Co.S.D. California· 2011-01-20· cited 18×
- Marathon Nat. Bank v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.California Court of Appeal· 1993-10-28· cited 15×
- Padilla v. McClellanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-11-19· cited 13×
- Trustees of the Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Golden Nugget, Inc.C.D. California· 1988-10-24· cited 8×
- Benson v. RubinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-03-19· cited 1×
- Winterrowd v. American GeneralNinth Circuit· 2009-02-17
- Martinez v. O'HaraCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2019-02-28
- Michael S. Yu, a Law Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2020-10-27
- Cruz v. Fusion Buffet, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2020-11-09
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 17,202×
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1983-06-15· cited 1,038×
- National Ass'n of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of DefenseD.C. Circuit· 1982-04-23· cited 402×
- Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-05-27· cited 117×
- In Re Marriage of CuevaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1978-11-09· cited 48×
- McDonald v. SeveryCalifornia Supreme Court· 1936-06-29· cited 44×
- Margolin v. Regional Planning CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-07-22· cited 36×
- Peabody v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1858-07-01· cited 29×
- Glendora Community Redevelopment Agency v. DemeterCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-05-07· cited 26×
- Shain v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1893-09-06· cited 11×
- Kaye v. Fast Food Operators, Inc.S.D. New York· 1983-09-16· cited 9×
- Klein v. MaddoxCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1943-06-10· cited 7×
- Dixon v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-08-01· cited 6×
- Johnson v. United StatesS.D. New York· 1984-01-11· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.