· 3/16/1995
Martinez v. United States Sugar Corp.
Citations
- 880 F. Supp. 773
- 42 Fed. R. Serv. 430
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3660
- 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1108
- 1995 WL 127173
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Plaintiff stated . . . that he had received the notice, but he could not remember the date on which he received it. ... Simply put, Plaintiff has not met his burden of proof.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kovachevich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.