Skip to main content
· 3/16/1995

Martinez v. United States Sugar Corp.

Citations

  • 880 F. Supp. 773
  • 42 Fed. R. Serv. 430
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3660
  • 67 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1108
  • 1995 WL 127173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Plaintiff stated . . . that he had received the notice, but he could not remember the date on which he received it. ... Simply put, Plaintiff has not met his burden of proof.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kovachevich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.