Skip to main content

Martinez v. State

Citations

  • 159 S.W.3d 655
  • 2004 WL 1117134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding noncompliance issue unpreserved because there was no objection and the motion for new trial did not raise it
  • addressing breach of plea agreement argument and concluding issue had not been preserved for review
  • breach-of-plea-agreement complaint was not preserved for review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Yáñez, Garza, Baird

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.