Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 6/17/2004
Martinez v. State
Citations
- 159 S.W.3d 655
- 2004 WL 1117134
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding noncompliance issue unpreserved because there was no objection and the motion for new trial did not raise it
- addressing breach of plea agreement argument and concluding issue had not been preserved for review
- breach-of-plea-agreement complaint was not preserved for review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Yáñez, Garza, Baird
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Joyner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2018-04-10· cited 7×
- Robert Stermer, Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-04-16
- Diane Marie Musachia v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2014-08-14
- Robert Ray Kassube v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2010-02-26
- Brandon Oneal Andrews v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2020-11-24
- Jason Dale January v. the State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2024-04-04
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.