Skip to main content
· 2/5/1985

Martinez v. Scandroli

Citations

  • 474 N.E.2d 456
  • 130 Ill. App. 3d 712
  • 85 Ill. Dec. 728
  • 1985 Ill. App. LEXIS 1568

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Once a cause is reached for hearing, *** the movant is then required to present especially grave reasons to support his request” for a continuance.
  • “Where no reason exists for substitution of counsel, a party should only be allowed sufficient time for his counsel to prepare, not for each subsequent counsel he may seek to prepare independently.”
  • no abuse of discretion in denying a motion for continuance where the case was set for a September 26 trial date on August 19, the plaintiff retained new counsel in early September, and counsel sought a continuance on September 19 and 23 because he had not had sufficient time to prepare

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Strouse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.