· 2/5/1985
Martinez v. Scandroli
Citations
- 474 N.E.2d 456
- 130 Ill. App. 3d 712
- 85 Ill. Dec. 728
- 1985 Ill. App. LEXIS 1568
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Once a cause is reached for hearing, *** the movant is then required to present especially grave reasons to support his request” for a continuance.
- “Where no reason exists for substitution of counsel, a party should only be allowed sufficient time for his counsel to prepare, not for each subsequent counsel he may seek to prepare independently.”
- no abuse of discretion in denying a motion for continuance where the case was set for a September 26 trial date on August 19, the plaintiff retained new counsel in early September, and counsel sought a continuance on September 19 and 23 because he had not had sufficient time to prepare
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Strouse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.