Martinez v. Potter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that when an amendment by summary-judgment response is permitted, “the federal rules contemplate a formal amended complaint [and] an amended answer”
• “[The Tenth Circuit’s] decisions have unambiguously recognized 11 Morgan as rejecting application of the ‘continuing violation’ theory.”
• “Morgan abrogates the continuing violation doctrine as previously applied . . . . [and o]ur decisions have unambiguously recognized Morgan as rejecting application of the ‘continuing violation’ theory.”
• “[E]ach discrete [discriminatory or retaliatory] incident . . . constitutes its own unlawful employment practice for which administrative remedies must be exhausted.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).