Supreme Court of Colorado· 5/27/2003
Martinez v. People
Citations
- 69 P.3d 1029
- 2003 Colo. LEXIS 469
- 2003 WL 21212123
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statutes concerning the same subject matter must be construed in pari materia to ascertain legislative intent and to avoid inconsistencies
- \Provisions in one act which are omitted in another on the same subject matter will be applied when the purposes of the two acts are consistent.\
- \Provisions in one act which are omitted in another on the same subject matter will be applied when the purposes of the two acts are consistent.\
- “Subject to constitutional limitations . . . , it is the prerogative of the legislature to define crimes and prescribe punishments.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coats
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lopez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2005-06-27· cited 1,102×
- v. GroskoColorado Court of Appeals· 2021-03-11· cited 748×
- Vensor v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2007-02-05· cited 292×
- Moffett v. Life Care Centers of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado· 2009-11-16· cited 205×
- A.S. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2013-10-28· cited 204×
- People v. AbiodunSupreme Court of Colorado· 2005-05-02· cited 93×
- Frank M. Hall & Co. v. NewsomSupreme Court of Colorado· 2005-12-19· cited 48×
- Union Pacific Railroad v. MartinSupreme Court of Colorado· 2009-06-08· cited 47×
- People v. DashColorado Court of Appeals· 2004-08-12· cited 46×
- BP America Production Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado· 2008-06-09· cited 30×
- Holcomb v. Jan-Pro Cleaning Systems of Southern ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado· 2007-12-17· cited 27×
- People v. NewmanSupreme Court of Colorado· 2004-05-24· cited 21×
- People v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado· 2015-12-21· cited 19×
- People v. CarrilloColorado Court of Appeals· 2013-01-17· cited 16×
- Allen v. ReedTenth Circuit· 2005-10-21· cited 11×
- People v. ButlerColorado Court of Appeals· 2009-07-09· cited 11×
- In re the Marriage of OhrColorado Court of Appeals· 2004-07-01· cited 11×
- Vaughn v. People Ex Rel. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado· 2006-05-15· cited 8×
- People v. LageColorado Court of Appeals· 2009-05-28· cited 7×
- Chism v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2003-12-08· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.