Martinez v. Pacific Bell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a nuisance claim because it concluded that there was no special relationship between the defendant and the third party and therefore no proximate causation
• rejecting a nuisance claim because it concluded that there was no special relationship between the defendant and the third party and therefore no proximate causation
• “The general rule of law is that no duty to control a third party’s conduct exists in the absence of some special relationship creating such a duty.”
• “Pac Bell did not own, possess, or control, and invited no one onto, the parking lot. It, thus, owed no duty of care to protect appellant at that location.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ileto v. Glock Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-11-20· cited 383×
• El Escorial Owners' Ass'n v. DLC Plastering, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-09-06· cited 67×
• In Re Firearm Cases
  California Court of Appeal· 2005-02-10· cited 48×
• Seaber v. Hotel Del Coronado
  California Court of Appeal· 1991-12-02· cited 33×
• Sakiyama v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-07-10· cited 23×
• Benetatos v. City of Los Angeles
  California Court of Appeal· 2015-04-14· cited 23×
• Walsh v. Tehachapi Unified School District
  E.D. California· 2011-10-28· cited 22×
• Lawrence v. City & County of San Francisco
  N.D. California· 2017-06-15· cited 19×
• Cornejo v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
  E.D. California· 2015-12-21· cited 17×
• Lew v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA CTY.
  California Court of Appeal· 1993-11-30· cited 16×
• Medina v. Hillshore Partners
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-11-21· cited 16×
• Ileto v. Glock, Inc.
  C.D. California· 2002-03-25· cited 12×
• The LUCKMAN PARTNERSHIP, INC. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
  California Court of Appeal· 2010-03-25· cited 11×
• Mendia v. Garcia
  N.D. California· 2016-02-26· cited 10×
• Suzuki v. City of Los Angeles
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-04-08· cited 7×
• Toomer v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-08-18· cited 6×
• Faulks v. Wells Fargo & Co.
  N.D. California· 2017-02-07· cited 5×
• Ileto v. Glock Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-05-28· cited 5×
• Ord & Norman v. Surplus Line Assn. of California
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-08-31
• Colonial Van & Storage, Inc. v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2022-03-18

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Moore v. Regents of University of California
  California Supreme Court· 1990-07-09· cited 394×
• Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial Hospital
  California Supreme Court· 1985-02-28· cited 274×
• Richards v. Stanley
  California Supreme Court· 1954-06-11· cited 218×
• Peterson v. San Francisco Community College District
  California Supreme Court· 1984-09-06· cited 208×
• Stoiber v. Honeychuck
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-02-05· cited 91×
• Lopez v. McDonald's Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-07-09· cited 82×
• Owens v. Kings Supermarket
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-02-04· cited 76×
• Southland Corp. v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-08-05· cited 48×
• Steinmetz v. Stockton City Chamber of Commerce
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-05-31· cited 32×
• Capolungo v. Bondi
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-03-28· cited 32×
• Nevarez v. Thriftimart, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1970-05-20· cited 30×
• Kane v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-11-02· cited 27×
• Vasquez v. Alameda
  California Supreme Court· 1958-01-28· cited 24×
• Balard v. Bassman Event Security, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1989-05-09· cited 15×
• Gonzalez v. Derrington
  California Supreme Court· 1961-06-26· cited 13×
• Vandermost v. Alpha Beta Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-02-15· cited 13×
• Dufour v. Henry J. Kaiser Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1963-04-11· cited 13×
• Tint v. Sanborn
  California Court of Appeal· 1989-06-28· cited 6×