Skip to main content
· 3/20/1956

Martinez v. Mundy

Citations

  • 295 P.2d 209
  • 61 N.M. 87

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an easement by prescription could not be acquired where the 6 appellant’s use of roads on the landowner’s property was in “common with and 7 similar to that of the general public”
  • discussing “the familiar rule that when a court of chancery obtains jurisdiction of a cause, it will retain it to administer full relief’
  • overruled in part in Strasser
  • overruled in part in Strasser

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McManus, Compton, Lujan, Sadler, McGhee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.