· 3/20/1956
Martinez v. Mundy
Citations
- 295 P.2d 209
- 61 N.M. 87
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an easement by prescription could not be acquired where the 6 appellant’s use of roads on the landowner’s property was in “common with and 7 similar to that of the general public”
- discussing “the familiar rule that when a court of chancery obtains jurisdiction of a cause, it will retain it to administer full relief’
- overruled in part in Strasser
- overruled in part in Strasser
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McManus, Compton, Lujan, Sadler, McGhee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.