California Court of Appeal· 4/15/2004
Martinez v. Master Protection Corp.
Citations
- 12 Cal. Rptr. 3d 663
- 118 Cal. App. 4th 107
- 2004 Daily Journal DAR 5214
- 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3744
- 2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 638
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding an arbitration agreement with a six-month limitation period substantively unconscionable because the shortened period is “insufficient to protect its employees’ right to vindicate their statutory rights”
- finding employment contract adhesive where arbitration agreement was presented as a specific “condition of employ- ment”
- rejecting provision because 21 “[t]he mere inclusion of the costs provision in the arbitration agreement produces an unacceptable 22 chilling effect”
- noting under California’s analogous state arbitration law that its equivalent provision “does not permit the trial court to choose an alternative forum where the chosen forum refuses to hear the case”
- finding an arbitration agreement procedurally unconscionable because it was a prerequisite of employment and the employee did not have an \opportunity to negotiate or refuse to sign the arbitration agreement\
- finding an agreement procedurally unconscionable 28 because it was a prerequisite of employment and the employee did not have an “opportunity to 1 negotiate or refuse to sign the arbitration agreement”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationNinth Circuit· 2006-12-04· cited 1,006×
- Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. MorenoCalifornia Supreme Court· 2013-10-17· cited 282×
- Carbajal v. CWPSC, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2016-02-26· cited 115×
- Jacquelin Davis v. O'Melveny & Myers, a California Limited Liability CorporationNinth Circuit· 2007-05-14· cited 108×
- Samaniego v. Empire Today, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-04-05· cited 101×
- Dotson v. Amgen, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2010-01-21· cited 93×
- Peleg v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2012-04-17· cited 76×
- Young Seok Suh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-02-18· cited 71×
- Gatton v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2007-06-22· cited 61×
- Carlson v. Home Team Pest Defense, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2015-08-17· cited 58×
- Wert v. ManorCare of Carlisle PA, LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-10-27· cited 56×
- Wherry v. Award, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2011-02-09· cited 53×
- Carmax Auto Superstores California LLC v. HernandezC.D. California· 2015-04-30· cited 43×
- Baxter v. Genworth N. Am. Corp.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-10-26· cited 39×
- Ontiveros v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2008-06-30· cited 35×
- Sanchez v. Western Pizza Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2009-03-17· cited 32×
- HM DG, Inc. v. Amini and BeizaiCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-09-20· cited 30×
- Romney v. Franciscan Medical GroupCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-17· cited 28×
- Penilla v. Westmont Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2016-09-09· cited 24×
- Lanigan v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-10-04· cited 22×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 1,269×
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1997-06-30· cited 717×
- A & M PRODUCE CO. v. FMC Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1982-08-27· cited 259×
- Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1997-01-09· cited 205×
- Mercuro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-02-13· cited 132×
- Misty Ferguson v. Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc., Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., and Leo Deleon Does 1-10, InclusiveNinth Circuit· 2002-07-23· cited 129×
- Kinney v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1999-03-29· cited 114×
- Harper v. UltimoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-12-05· cited 96×
- Brock v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-11-20· cited 75×
- American Software, Inc. v. AliCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-06-28· cited 56×
- O'HARE v. Municipal Resource ConsultantsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-03-21· cited 54×
- Beynon v. Garden Grove Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-01-04· cited 46×
- McManus v. CIBC World Markets Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2003-05-23· cited 45×
- Aubry v. GoldhorCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-04-21· cited 22×
- Alan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-08-14· cited 17×
- Wall Street Associates, L.P. v. Becker Paribas, Inc.S.D. New York· 1993-04-28· cited 13×
- Sequeira v. Rincon-Vitova Insectaries, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1995-02-22· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.