Colorado Court of Appeals· 11/27/1981
Martinez v. Martinez
Citations
- 638 P.2d 834
- 1981 Colo. App. LEXIS 894
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing the occupying party the opportunity to retain the subject property to “reach an equitable result”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coyte, Sternberg, Kirshbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. LeshSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-08-29· cited 43×
- Zick v. KrobColorado Court of Appeals· 1993-10-07· cited 12×
- Kellogg v. Dearborn Information Services, LLCMontana Supreme Court· 2005-07-28· cited 8×
- Keith v. El-KarehColorado Court of Appeals· 1986-10-09· cited 8×
- Colorado Korean Ass'n v. KOREAN SEN. ASS'N.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2006-11-16· cited 3×
- McNamara v. MossmanColorado Court of Appeals· 2010-03-18· cited 2×
- Donnelly v. CapodiciNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1987-12-24· cited 2×
- Cannon v. WaddellColorado Court of Appeals· 1981-12-24
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Linley v. HansonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1970-11-30· cited 116×
- Baird v. MooreNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1958-05-09· cited 22×
- Fundaburk v. CodySupreme Court of Alabama· 1954-05-13· cited 12×
- Johnson v. FordSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1961-04-24· cited 10×
- Trimble v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court· 1934-10-08· cited 10×
- Cochran v. BurdickDistrict of Columbia· 1937-02-23· cited 7×
- Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Colorado· 1960-05-16· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.