Martinez v. Logsdon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that the district court could sua sponte grant summary judgment since there were no material issues of fact
• indicating that the district court could sua sponte grant summary judgment since there were no material issues of fact
• stating that when no material factual issues are in dispute, trial court may grant summary judgment in favor of non-moving party even though that party has not itself moved for summary judgment
• indicating that the court would not be barred from granting summary judgment sua sponte if proper, i.e., there were no material fact issues in dispute and the moving party was entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law
• indicating that the court would not be barred from granting summary judgment sua sponte if proper, i.e., there were no material fact issues in dispute and the moving party was entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law
• court not barred from granting summary judgment by absence of motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).