Martinez v. Cornejo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that determining whether the plaintiffs had an actionable claim required statutory construction, which is a question of law reviewed de novo
• concluding that a statute’s 10 meaning was unambiguous and application of other rules of construction was 11 therefore unnecessary
• stating that the legal obligations of a contract “may be either expressed in the contract or implied, such as any obligation of good faith or implied warranties”
• stating that the legal obligations of a 7 contract “may be either expressed in the contract or implied, such as any obligation 8 of good faith or implied warranties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).