Martinez v. City of Schenectady

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a tort claim for money damages was unavailable because reversal of the plaintiff’s prior conviction provided an adequate remedy
• holding that a tort claim for money damages was unavailable because reversal of the plaintiff’s prior conviction provided an adequate remedy
• holding that a tort claim for money damages was unavailable because reversal of the plaintiff’s prior conviction provided an adequate remedy
• explaining that New York false imprisonment requires a defendant “intended” to confine a plaintiff
• finding no favorable termination where the plaintiff’s conviction was reversed “not because of [the plaintiff’s] lack of culpability” but because the “conviction was obtained pursuant to a faulty search warrant”
• “A termination is not favorable ... where a prosecution ends because of a compromise with the accused”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).