Martinez v. City of Albuquerque

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that a finding that a plaintiff “resisted a lawful arrest . . . may coexist with a finding that the police officers used excessive force to subdue him . . . [because] a jury could find that the police officers effectuated a lawful arrest of [the plaintiff] in an unlawful manner”
• federal 5 In the same motion, plaintiff asked for “Leave for 30 Days to Respond to Defendants[’] Reply in Support of Motion to Stay” (Doc. 58). Defendants had filed a Motion to Stay Discovery (Doc. 45) on April 3, 2019. Plaintiff responded (Doc. 54
• Heck no bar to excessive force claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).