Martinez v. China Boy, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting the citation of unpublished opinions under Rule 1:36-3 as \useful for the limited purpose of presenting relevant but general background and history\
• \Public comments should be \given a meaningful role\ in the process of rule adoption\
• even if the agency misconstrued or perhaps exaggerated the comments and support for its actions, \we cannot say that such response in isolation (or even assuming a minimal number of other such responses) would support a finding that respondents violated the APA\
• upholding the validity of the 2010 CBBMP

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).