Martinez v. Caldwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The deferential standard afforded to state court decisions, which is specifically articulated in § 2254, is not included in the text of § 2241.”
• “The deferential standard afforded to state court decisions, which is specifically articulated in § 2254, is not included in the text of § 2241.”
• “The deferential standard afforded to state court decisions, which is specifically articulated in § 2254, is not included in the text of § 2241.”
• “[Section] 2254(d) was designed to impose additional burdens on post- conviction habeas petitioners and to effect the gatekeeping function of the [AEDPA].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).