Martinez v. ABINADER

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that issue of retroactive alimony was preserved where raised on the record at trial
• stating that the trial court should consider all sources of a party's income in determining the ability to pay alimony
• reversing in part because trial court failed to address husband’s voluntary contributions to AARP 401(k) plan or the fact that husband was making payments on investment property that he purchased after parties’ separation
• reversing the final judgment of dissolution where the trial court found that the husband's gross monthly income was $4,264, but this amount was not reflected in his most recent affidavit and did not include his overtime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).