· 7/9/2004
Martinez Ex Rel. Martinez v. Val Verde County Hospital District
Citations
- 140 S.W.3d 370
- 47 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 886
- 2004 Tex. LEXIS 651
- 2004 WL 1535239
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- demonstrating the strictness with which section 101.101 has been applied by concluding that patient’s minority did not toll the notice period of section 101.101
- demonstrating the strictness with which section 101.101 has been applied by concluding that patient's minority did not toll the notice period of section 101.101
- demonstrating the strictness with which section 101.101 has been applied by concluding that patient’s minority did not toll the notice period of section 101.101
- noting affirmative defense must be raised in a motion for summary judgment—not in a plea to the jurisdiction
- affirming trial court’s grant of a plea to the jurisdiction where plaintiffs did not contend the hospital district had actual notice before the six-month deadline
- reciting, as uncontroversial background, the fact that the trial court sustained a plea to the jurisdiction and severed related claims, thereby finalizing judgment as to those claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hecht
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.