Skip to main content
· 7/9/2004

Martinez Ex Rel. Martinez v. Val Verde County Hospital District

Citations

  • 140 S.W.3d 370
  • 47 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 886
  • 2004 Tex. LEXIS 651
  • 2004 WL 1535239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • demonstrating the strictness with which section 101.101 has been applied by concluding that patient’s minority did not toll the notice period of section 101.101
  • demonstrating the strictness with which section 101.101 has been applied by concluding that patient's minority did not toll the notice period of section 101.101
  • demonstrating the strictness with which section 101.101 has been applied by concluding that patient’s minority did not toll the notice period of section 101.101
  • noting affirmative defense must be raised in a motion for summary judgment—not in a plea to the jurisdiction
  • affirming trial court’s grant of a plea to the jurisdiction where plaintiffs did not contend the hospital district had actual notice before the six-month deadline
  • reciting, as uncontroversial background, the fact that the trial court sustained a plea to the jurisdiction and severed related claims, thereby finalizing judgment as to those claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hecht

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.