Martin v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the Court of Appeals has “summarily rejected” the argument that an administrative remedy is ineffective simply because “an agency cannot provide injunctive relief’
• ‘the First Amendment does not require the government to provide access to information it possesses on demand, and it certainly does not require the government to gather information.”
• “[A] cause of action exists under the First Amendment which allows a recipient to allege that government conduct has chilled the speech of a willing speaker.” (citing Taylor v. Res. Trust Corp., 56 F.3d 1497, 1508 (D.C. Cir. 1995))
• dismissing suit for failure to exhaust OSC remedy
• dismissing suit for failure to exhaust OSC remedy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).