Martin v. U-Haul Co. of Fresno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because of a 30 day notice provision, party limited to damages potentially accruing during a 30-day period after the breach
• “[Contract damages are limited to those foreseeable by the parties at the time of contracting.”
• “Parties who agree that a contract may be terminated for any reason, or no reason, upon the giving of the specified notice could not reasonably anticipate that damages could exceed that notice period.”
• “Damages are awarded in an action for breach of contract to give the injured party the benefit of his bargain and insofar as possible to place him in the same position he would have been in had the promisor performed the contract.”
• contract for sale of used cardboard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).