Martin v. Taylor

Citations

• 2024 Ohio 3207

Syllabus

RECONSIDERATION – App.R. 26(A) the record establishes this court did not make any obvious errors or render a decision that is not supported by the law the trial court committed no error in granting Appellees' motion for summary judgment and denying Appellant's motion for summary judgment Appellant's $1,400 EIP3 payment under ARPA is not exempt from garnishment to pay court costs upon consideration of the App.R. 26(A) application, Appellant has not demonstrated any obvious errors or raised any issues that were not adequately addressed in our previous opinion this court is not persuaded that we erred as a matter of law pro se application denied.