· 10/30/1979
Martin v. Steubner
Citations
- 485 F. Supp. 88
- 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8876
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Ohio law applied when defendants advertised in Wall Street Journal with circulation in Ohio and mailed letters to plaintiff in Ohio including contract signed by plaintiff in Ohio
- “[Section 1707.43(A) ] is not punitive but simply permits the purchaser to rescind the transaction and puts the parties in the position they were in before the contract was entered into.”
- Ohio law applied when defendants advertised in Wall Street Journal with circulation in Ohio and mailed letters to plaintiff in Ohio including contract signed by plaintiff in Ohio
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Duncan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.