Skip to main content
· 10/30/1979

Martin v. Steubner

Citations

  • 485 F. Supp. 88
  • 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8876

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Ohio law applied when defendants advertised in Wall Street Journal with circulation in Ohio and mailed letters to plaintiff in Ohio including contract signed by plaintiff in Ohio
  • “[Section 1707.43(A) ] is not punitive but simply permits the purchaser to rescind the transaction and puts the parties in the position they were in before the contract was entered into.”
  • Ohio law applied when defendants advertised in Wall Street Journal with circulation in Ohio and mailed letters to plaintiff in Ohio including contract signed by plaintiff in Ohio

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.